🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.